Total
602 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-12662 | 1 Cisco | 135 Ios Xe, Mds 9000, Nexus 3016 and 132 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
|
A vulnerability in Cisco NX-OS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with valid administrator or privilege level 15 credentials to load a virtual service image and bypass signature verification on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper signature verification during the installation of an Open Virtual Appliance (OVA) image. An authenticated, local attacker could exploit this vulnerability and load a malicious, unsigned OVA image on an af ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2019-12649 | 1 Cisco | 87 Catalyst 3850-12s-e, Catalyst 3850-12s-s, Catalyst 3850-12xs-e and 84 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
|
A vulnerability in the Image Verification feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on an affected device. The vulnerability exists because, under certain circumstances, an affected device can be configured to not verify the digital signatures of system image files during the boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by abusing a specific feature that is part of the de ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2019-12269 | 1 Enigmail | 1 Enigmail | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
Enigmail before 2.0.11 allows PGP signature spoofing: for an inline PGP message, an attacker can cause the product to display a "correctly signed" message indication, but display different unauthenticated text.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-11841 | 2 Debian, Golang | 2 Debian Linux, Crypto | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
|
A message-forgery issue was discovered in crypto/openpgp/clearsign/clearsign.go in supplementary Go cryptography libraries 2019-03-25. According to the OpenPGP Message Format specification in RFC 4880 chapter 7, a cleartext signed message can contain one or more optional "Hash" Armor Headers. The "Hash" Armor Header specifies the message digest algorithm(s) used for the signature. However, the Go clearsign package ignores the value of this header, which allows an attacker to spoof it. Consequent ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2019-11755 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
A crafted S/MIME message consisting of an inner encryption layer and an outer SignedData layer was shown as having a valid digital signature, although the signer might have had no access to the contents of the encrypted message, and might have stripped a different signature from the encrypted message. Previous versions had only suppressed showing a digital signature for messages with an outer multipart/signed layer. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 68.1.1.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-10575 | 1 Qualcomm | 6 Sda845, Sda845 Firmware, Sdm845 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
|
Wlan binary which is not signed with OEMs RoT is working on secure device without authentication failure in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in SDA845, SDM845, SDM850
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-10562 | 1 Qualcomm | 56 Ipq6018, Ipq6018 Firmware, Kamorta and 53 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
|
u'Improper authentication and signature verification of debug polices in secure boot loader will allow unverified debug policies to be loaded into secure memory and leads to memory corruption' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in IPQ6018, Kamorta, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS404, QCS605, QCS610, Rennell, SA415M, SA6155P, SC7180, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2019-10201 | 1 Redhat | 2 Keycloak, Single Sign-on | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
|
It was found that Keycloak's SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the <Signature> sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-10136 | 1 Redhat | 2 Satellite, Spacewalk | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
|
It was found that Spacewalk, all versions through 2.9, did not safely compute client token checksums. An attacker with a valid, but expired, authenticated set of headers could move some digits around, artificially extending the session validity without modifying the checksum.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-1010279 | 1 Oisf | 1 Suricata | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
Open Information Security Foundation Suricata prior to version 4.1.3 is affected by: Denial of Service - TCP/HTTP detection bypass. The impact is: An attacker can evade a signature detection with a specialy formed sequence of network packets. The component is: detect.c (https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/3625/commits/d8634daf74c882356659addb65fb142b738a186b). The attack vector is: An attacker can trigger the vulnerability by a specifically crafted network TCP session. The fixed version is: 4. ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2019-1010263 | 1 Perl Crypt\ | 1 \ | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
|
Perl Crypt::JWT prior to 0.023 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: allow attackers to bypass authentication by providing a token by crafting with hmac(). The component is: JWT.pm, line 614. The attack vector is: network connectivity. The fixed version is: after commit b98a59b42ded9f9e51b2560410106207c2152d6c.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-1010161 | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt Project | 1 Perl-crypt-jwt | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
|
perl-CRYPT-JWT 0.022 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: bypass authentication. The component is: JWT.pm for JWT security token, line 614 in _decode_jws(). The attack vector is: network connectivity(crafting user-controlled input to bypass authentication). The fixed version is: 0.023.
|
|||||
| CVE-2019-0071 | 1 Juniper | 4 Ex2300, Ex2300-c, Ex3400 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
|
Veriexec is a kernel-based file integrity subsystem in Junos OS that ensures only authorized binaries are able to be executed. Due to a flaw in specific versions of Junos OS, affecting specific EX Series platforms, the Veriexec subsystem will fail to initialize, in essence disabling file integrity checking. This may allow a locally authenticated user with shell access to install untrusted executable images, and elevate privileges to gain full control of the system. During the installation of an ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2018-8955 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Gravityzone | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
|
The installer for BitDefender GravityZone relies on an encoded string in a filename to determine the URL for installation metadata, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by changing the filename while leaving the file's digital signature unchanged.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-7711 | 2 Debian, Simplesamlphp | 3 Debian Linux, Saml2, Simplesamlphp | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
|
HTTPRedirect.php in the saml2 library in SimpleSAMLphp before 1.15.4 has an incorrect check of return values in the signature validation utilities, allowing an attacker to get invalid signatures accepted as valid by forcing an error during validation. This occurs because of a dependency on PHP functionality that interprets a -1 error code as a true boolean value.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-7685 | 1 Opensuse | 1 Libzypp | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
|
The decoupled download and installation steps in libzypp before 17.5.0 could lead to a corrupted RPM being left in the cache, where a later call would not display the corrupted RPM warning and allow installation, a problem caused by malicious warnings only displayed during download.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-7644 | 1 Simplesamlphp | 1 Simplesamlphp | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
The XmlSecLibs library as used in the saml2 library in SimpleSAMLphp before 1.15.3 incorrectly verifies signatures on SAML assertions, allowing a remote attacker to construct a crafted SAML assertion on behalf of an Identity Provider that would pass as cryptographically valid, thereby allowing them to impersonate a user from that Identity Provider, aka a key confusion issue.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-7340 | 1 Cisco | 1 Duo Network Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
Duo Network Gateway 1.2.9 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-6664 | 2 Mcafee, Microsoft | 2 Data Loss Prevention Endpoint, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
|
Application Protections Bypass vulnerability in Microsoft Windows in McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Endpoint before 10.0.500 and DLP Endpoint before 11.0.400 allows authenticated users to bypass the product block action via a command-line utility.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-6459 | 1 Strongswan | 1 Strongswan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
|
The rsa_pss_params_parse function in libstrongswan/credentials/keys/signature_params.c in strongSwan 5.6.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted RSASSA-PSS signature that lacks a mask generation function parameter.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-5923 | 1 Hp | 276 Color Laserjet Cm4540 Mfp, Color Laserjet Cm4540 Mfp Firmware, Color Laserjet Cp5525 and 273 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
|
In HP LaserJet Enterprise, HP PageWide Enterprise, HP LaserJet Managed, and HP OfficeJet Enterprise Printers, solution application signature checking may allow potential execution of arbitrary code.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-5387 | 1 Wizkunde | 1 Samlbase | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
Wizkunde SAMLBase may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-4111 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
|
An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. macOS before 10.13.4 is affected. The issue involves the "Mail" component. It allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read S/MIME encrypted message content by sending HTML e-mail that references remote resources but lacks a valid S/MIME signature.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-3968 | 1 Denx | 1 U-boot | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
|
An exploitable vulnerability exists in the verified boot protection of the Das U-Boot from version 2013.07-rc1 to 2014.07-rc2. The affected versions lack proper FIT signature enforcement, which allows an attacker to bypass U-Boot's verified boot and execute an unsigned kernel, embedded in a legacy image format. To trigger this vulnerability, a local attacker needs to be able to supply the image to boot.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-3756 | 1 Hyperledger | 1 Iroha | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
Hyperledger Iroha versions v1.0_beta and v1.0.0_beta-1 are vulnerable to transaction and block signature verification bypass in the transaction and block validator allowing a single node to sign a transaction and/or block multiple times, each with a random nonce, and have other validating nodes accept them as separate valid signatures.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-1842 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 LOW | 3.6 LOW |
|
IBM Cognos Analytics 11 Configuration tool, under certain circumstances, will bypass OIDC namespace signature verification on its id_token. IBM X-Force ID: 150902.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-18688 | 11 Apple, Code-industry, Foxitsoftware and 8 more | 16 Macos, Master Pdf Editor, Foxit Reader and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
|
The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, an Incremental Saving vulnerability exists in multiple products. When an attacker uses the Incremental Saving feature to add pages or annotations, Body Updates are displayed to the user without any action by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2018-18653 | 1 Canonical | 1 Ubuntu Linux | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
|
The Linux kernel, as used in Ubuntu 18.10 and when booted with UEFI Secure Boot enabled, allows privileged local users to bypass intended Secure Boot restrictions and execute untrusted code by loading arbitrary kernel modules. This occurs because a modified kernel/module.c, in conjunction with certain configuration options, leads to mishandling of the result of signature verification.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-18509 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
|
A flaw during verification of certain S/MIME signatures causes emails to be shown in Thunderbird as having a valid digital signature, even if the shown message contents aren't covered by the signature. The flaw allows an attacker to reuse a valid S/MIME signature to craft an email message with arbitrary content. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.5.1.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-18203 | 1 Subaru | 6 Starlink 2017, Starlink 2017 Firmware, Starlink 2018 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
|
A vulnerability in the update mechanism of Subaru StarLink Harman head units 2017, 2018, and 2019 may give an attacker (with physical access to the vehicle's USB ports) the ability to rewrite the firmware of the head unit. This occurs because the device accepts modified QNX6 filesystem images (as long as the attacker obtains access to certain Harman decryption/encryption code) as a consequence of a bug where unsigned images pass a validity check. An attacker could potentially install persistent ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2018-16557 | 1 Siemens | 8 Simatic S7-400, Simatic S7-400 Firmware, Simatic S7-400 Pn\/dp V7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
|
A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-1 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 412-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-3 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 414F-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V7.0.3), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-2 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-3 DP V7 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 CPU 416-3 PN/DP V7 (All versions < V ...
Show More |
|||||
| CVE-2018-16515 | 2 Debian, Matrix | 2 Debian Linux, Synapse | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
|
Matrix Synapse before 0.33.3.1 allows remote attackers to spoof events and possibly have unspecified other impacts by leveraging improper transaction and event signature validation.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-16253 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
|
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is an even more permissive variant of CVE-2006-4790 and CVE-2014-1568.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-16150 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
|
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509 certificates. This is a variant of CVE-2006-4340.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-16149 | 1 Axtls Project | 1 Axtls | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
|
In sig_verify() in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures (and put them on X.509 certificates) to induce illegal memory access and crash the verifier.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-16042 | 5 Adobe, Apple, Iskysoft and 2 more | 8 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Reader and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
|
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2019.008.20080 and earlier, 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2017.011.30106 and earlier version, 2017.011.30105 and earlier version, 2015.006.30457 and earlier, and 2015.006.30456 and earlier have a security bypass vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-15836 | 1 Xelerance | 1 Openswan | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
|
In verify_signed_hash() in lib/liboswkeys/signatures.c in Openswan before 2.6.50.1, the RSA implementation does not verify the value of padding string during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used. IKEv2 signature verification is affected when RAW RSA keys are used.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-15587 | 2 Debian, Gnome | 2 Debian Linux, Evolution | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
|
GNOME Evolution through 3.28.2 is prone to OpenPGP signatures being spoofed for arbitrary messages using a specially crafted email that contains a valid signature from the entity to be impersonated as an attachment.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-15586 | 1 Enigmail | 1 Enigmail | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
|
Enigmail before 2.0.6 is prone to to OpenPGP signatures being spoofed for arbitrary messages using a PGP/INLINE signature wrapped within a specially crafted multipart HTML email.
|
|||||
| CVE-2018-15374 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
|
A vulnerability in the Image Verification feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install a malicious software image or file on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to the affected software improperly verifying digital signatures for software images and files that are uploaded to a device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious software image or file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacke ...
Show More |
|||||