Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor 9bis
Filtered by product Kitty
Angry Yack Logo
Total 5 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2023-48795 42 9bis, Apache, Apple and 39 more 68 Kitty, Sshd, Sshj and 65 more 2025-11-04 N/A 5.9 MEDIUM
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the ha ...

Show More

CVE-2024-25004 1 9bis 1 Kitty 2025-05-15 N/A 7.8 HIGH
KiTTY versions 0.76.1.13 and before is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow via the username, occurs due to insufficient bounds checking and input sanitization (at line 2600). This allows an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory, which leads to arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2024-23749 1 9bis 1 Kitty 2025-05-15 N/A 7.8 HIGH
KiTTY versions 0.76.1.13 and before is vulnerable to command injection via the filename variable, occurs due to insufficient input sanitization and validation, failure to escape special characters, and insecure system calls (at lines 2369-2390). This allows an attacker to add inputs inside the filename variable, leading to arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2024-25003 1 9bis 1 Kitty 2025-05-08 N/A 7.8 HIGH
KiTTY versions 0.76.1.13 and before is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow via the hostname, occurs due to insufficient bounds checking and input sanitization. This allows an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory, which leads to arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2016-2563 2 9bis, Simon Tatham 2 Kitty, Putty 2025-04-12 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
Stack-based buffer overflow in the SCP command-line utility in PuTTY before 0.67 and KiTTY 0.66.6.3 and earlier allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (stack memory corruption) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted SCP-SINK file-size response to an SCP download request.