Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Valentin Agachi Create Posts &amp; Terms create-posts-terms allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Create Posts &amp; Terms: from n/a through <= 1.3.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jupitercow WP sIFR wp-sifr allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP sIFR: from n/a through <= 0.6.8.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Peter Sterling Simple Archive Generator allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Archive Generator: from n/a through 5.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mg12 WP-EasyArchives allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP-EasyArchives: from n/a through 3.1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rene Ade SensitiveTagCloud allows Stored XSS.This issue affects SensitiveTagCloud: from n/a through 1.4.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Socialprofilr Social Profilr allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Social Profilr: from n/a through 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wolfgang Häfelinger Custom Style allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Style: from n/a through 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Furr PDF Creator Lite pdf-creator-lite allows Stored XSS.This issue affects PDF Creator Lite: from n/a through <= 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Zoho Mail Zoho ZeptoMail allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Zoho ZeptoMail: from n/a through 3.3.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ZIPANG Simple Stripe simple-stripe allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Stripe: from n/a through <= 0.9.17.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in andriassundskard wpNamedUsers wpnamedusers allows Stored XSS.This issue affects wpNamedUsers: from n/a through <= 0.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Norbert Slick Google Map slick-google-map allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Slick Google Map: from n/a through <= 0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in nitinmaurya12 Block Country block-country allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Block Country: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themefy Bloggie allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Bloggie: from n/a through 2.0.8.

SOUND4 IMPACT/FIRST/PULSE/Eco v2.x contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit HTTP requests to the radio processing interface, triggering unintended administrative operations when a logged-in user visits the page.

JM-DATA ONU JF511-TV version 1.0.67 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, allowing attackers to perform administrative actions on behalf of authenticated users without their knowledge or consent.

KYOCERA Net Admin 3.4.0906 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that automatically submit forms to add new admin accounts with predefined credentials when a logged-in user visits the page.

Emlog is an open source website building system. In version 2.5.23, article creation functionality is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This can lead to a user being forced to post an article with arbitrary, attacker-controlled content. This, when combined with stored cross-site scripting, leads to account takeover. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dinesh Karki WP Armour Extended.This issue affects WP Armour Extended: from n/a through 1.26.

b2evolution 7.2.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin account details without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit unauthorized changes to user profiles by tricking victims into loading a specially crafted webpage.

The LEAV Last Email Address Validator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions <= 1.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the display_settings_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

A security flaw has been discovered in ajayrandhawa User-Management-PHP-MYSQL web up to fedcf58797bf2791591606f7b61fdad99ad8bff1. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Performing manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was co ... A security flaw has been discovered in ajayrandhawa User-Management-PHP-MYSQL web up to fedcf58797bf2791591606f7b61fdad99ad8bff1. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Performing manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show More

The does not sanitise and escape some parameters when outputting them back in a page, allowing unauthenticated users the ability to perform stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.

All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to create a new user with global administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

GestSup versions up to and including 3.2.60 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability where the application does not verify the authenticity of client requests. An attacker can induce a logged-in user to submit crafted requests that perform actions with the victim's privileges. This can be exploited to create privileged accounts by targeting the administrative user creation endpoint.

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP-DownloadManager plugin before 1.61 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

The Change wp-admin login WordPress plugin before 1.1.0 does not properly check for authorisation and is also missing CSRF check when updating its settings, which could allow unauthenticated users to change the settings. The attacked could also be performed via a CSRF vector

The WPBlogSyn plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's remote sync settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The SocialChamp with WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Stopwords for comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'set_stopwords_for_comments' and 'delete_stopwords_for_comments' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or delete stopwords via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Sosh Share Buttons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'admin_page_content' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The DASHBOARD BUILDER – WordPress plugin for Charts and Graphs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings handler in dashboardbuilder-admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the stored SQL query and database credentials used by the [show-dashboardbuilder] shortcode via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into perform ... The DASHBOARD BUILDER – WordPress plugin for Charts and Graphs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings handler in dashboardbuilder-admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the stored SQL query and database credentials used by the [show-dashboardbuilder] shortcode via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The modified SQL query is subsequently executed on the front-end when the shortcode is rendered, enabling arbitrary SQL injection and data exfiltration through the publicly visible chart output.

Show More

A vulnerability was detected in PHPEMS up to 11.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely.

The Clearfy Cache – WordPress optimization plugin, Minify HTML, CSS & JS, Defer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the "wbcr_upm_change_flag" function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable plugin/theme update notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Due to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SAP Fiori App Intercompany Balance Reconciliation an attacker could execute state?changing actions using an inappropriate request type, this deviation from expected request semantics may allow an attacker to trigger unintended actions on behalf of an authenticated user causing low impact on integrity of the system. This has no impact on confidentiality and availability.

The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form Builder, Custom Login Form, User Profile, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'process_row_actions' function with the 'delete' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary post via a forged request granted they can trick a site ... The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form Builder, Custom Login Form, User Profile, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'process_row_actions' function with the 'delete' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary post via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show More

Weblate is a web based localization tool. The Create Component functionality in Weblate allows authorized users to add new translation components by specifying both a version control system and a source code repository URL to pull from. However, prior to version 5.15, the repository URL field is not validated or sanitized, allowing an attacker to supply arbitrary protocols, hostnames, and IP addresses, including localhost, internal network addresses, and local filenames. When the Mercurial versi ... Weblate is a web based localization tool. The Create Component functionality in Weblate allows authorized users to add new translation components by specifying both a version control system and a source code repository URL to pull from. However, prior to version 5.15, the repository URL field is not validated or sanitized, allowing an attacker to supply arbitrary protocols, hostnames, and IP addresses, including localhost, internal network addresses, and local filenames. When the Mercurial version control system is selected, Weblate exposes the full server-side HTTP response for the provided URL. This effectively creates a server-side request forgery (SSRF) primitive that can probe internal services and return their contents. In addition to accessing internal HTTP endpoints, the behavior also enables local file enumeration by attempting file:// requests. While file contents may not always be returned, the application’s error messages clearly differentiate between files that exist and files that do not, revealing information about the server’s filesystem layout. In cloud environments, this behavior is particularly dangerous, as internal-only endpoints such as cloud metadata services may be accessible, potentially leading to credential disclosure and full environment compromise. This has been addressed in the Weblate 5.15 release. As a workaround, remove Mercurial from `VCS_BACKENDS`; the Git backend is not affected. The Git backend was already configured to block the file protocol and does not expose the HTTP response content in the error message.

Show More

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Restajet Information Technologies Inc. Online Food Delivery System allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Online Food Delivery System: through 19122025.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Education Zone allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Education Zone: from n/a through 1.3.4.