Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Unauthenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Uniguest Tripleplay before 24.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary scripts via the page parameter.

A spoofing vulnerability exists in Azure DevOps Server when it improperly handles requests to authorize applications, resulting in a cross-site request forgery. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass OAuth protections and register an application on behalf of the targeted user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a page specifically designed to cause a cross-site request. The attacker would then need to convince a targeted user to click ... A spoofing vulnerability exists in Azure DevOps Server when it improperly handles requests to authorize applications, resulting in a cross-site request forgery. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass OAuth protections and register an application on behalf of the targeted user. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a page specifically designed to cause a cross-site request. The attacker would then need to convince a targeted user to click a link to the malicious page. The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Azure DevOps Server protects application registration requests.

Show More

In AdGuardHome, versions v0.95 through v0.108.0-b.13 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), in the custom filtering rules functionality. An attacker can persuade an authorized user to follow a malicious link, resulting in deleting/modifying the custom filtering rules.

The Logo Manager For Enamad WordPress plugin through 0.7.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The KKProgressbar2 Free WordPress plugin through 1.1.4.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The KKProgressbar2 Free WordPress plugin through 1.1.4.2 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in version 0.5.0 of imartinez/privategpt allows an attacker to delete all uploaded files on the server. This can lead to data loss and service disruption for the application's users.

The Muslim Prayer Time BD WordPress plugin through 2.4 does not have CSRF check in place when reseting its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin reset them via a CSRF attack

The wp-affiliate-platform WordPress plugin before 6.5.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in user change them via a CSRF attack

The wp-affiliate-platform WordPress plugin before 6.5.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

The wp-affiliate-platform WordPress plugin before 6.5.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make non-logged in users execute an XSS payload via a CSRF attack

The Newsletter Popup WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not have CSRF check when deleting subscriber, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack

The WP-Eggdrop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpegg_updateOptions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_file_manager page that includes files through the 'lang' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include local JavaScript files that can be leveraged to achieve RCE via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. ... The File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_file_manager page that includes files through the 'lang' parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include local JavaScript files that can be leveraged to achieve RCE via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This issue was partially patched in version 7.2.4, and fully patched in 7.2.5.

Show More

The WordPress Ping Optimizer WordPress plugin through 2.35.1.3.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as clearing logs.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themeton Seven Stars allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Seven Stars: from n/a through 1.4.4.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Javier Revilla ValidateCertify allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects ValidateCertify: from n/a through 1.6.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in QuanticaLabs CSS3 Accordions for WordPress allows Stored XSS. This issue affects CSS3 Accordions for WordPress: from n/a through 3.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in kamleshyadav Pixel WordPress Form BuilderPlugin & Autoresponder allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Pixel WordPress Form BuilderPlugin & Autoresponder: from n/a through 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeMove QuickCal allows Privilege Escalation. This issue affects QuickCal: from n/a through 1.0.13.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themeton Spare allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Spare: from n/a through 1.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in loopus WP Ultimate Tours Builder allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Ultimate Tours Builder: from n/a through 1.055.

The AlT Monitoring plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ALT_Monitoring_edit' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Audio Comments Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'audio-comments/audior-settings.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The DN Shipping by Weight for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

The 3DPrint Lite WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack.

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in kishan0725's Hospital Management System version 6.3.5. The vulnerability allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML form that submits a request to delete a doctor record. By enticing an authenticated admin user to visit the specially crafted web page, the attacker can leverage the victim's browser to make unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint, effectively allowing the attacker to perform actions on behalf of the admin witho ... A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in kishan0725's Hospital Management System version 6.3.5. The vulnerability allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML form that submits a request to delete a doctor record. By enticing an authenticated admin user to visit the specially crafted web page, the attacker can leverage the victim's browser to make unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint, effectively allowing the attacker to perform actions on behalf of the admin without their consent.

Show More

The CommentTweets WordPress plugin through 0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tobias WP2LEADS allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP2LEADS: from n/a through 3.5.0.

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ResIOT ResIOT IOT Platform + LoRaWAN Network Server through 4.1.1000114 allows attackers to add new admin users to the platform or other unspecified impacts.

The ArtPlacer Widget WordPress plugin before 2.21.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack

flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/update_menu.php.

flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/delete_menu.php.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in flusity-CMS v.2.33 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the add_customblock.php.

The LuckyWP Table of Contents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ajaxEdit' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet.

Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.

The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting groups or emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin remove them via a CSRF attack

The Smart Image Gallery WordPress plugin before 1.0.19 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack

Tenda AX1803 US_AX1803v2.0br_v1.0.0.1_2994_CN_ZGYD01_4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot.