Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Cross Site Request Forgery found in yzCMS v.2.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the token check function.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Neeke HongCMS 3.0.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and escalate privileges via the updateusers parameter.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in GreenCMS v.2.3 allows an attacker to gain privileges via the adduser function of index.php.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < ... A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The CLI feature in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This could allow an attacker to read or modify the device configuration by tricking an authenticated legitimate user into accessing a malicious link.

Show More

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in SourceCodester Simple Online Bidding System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function save_product of the file /admin/index.php?page=manage_product of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-266383.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Bidding System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /simple-online-bidding-system/admin/ajax.php?action=save_user. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-264465 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Karl Kiesinger Country Blocker allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Country Blocker: from n/a through 3.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tickera.com Tickera allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Tickera: from n/a through 3.5.1.0.

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in WP Tweet Walls versions prior to 1.0.4. If this vulnerability is exploited, an attacker allows a user who logs in to the WordPress site where the affected plugin is enabled to access a malicious page. As a result, the user may perform unintended operations on the WordPress site.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paloma Paloma Widget allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Paloma Widget: from n/a through 1.14.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kiboko Labs Namaste! LMS allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Namaste! LMS: from n/a through 2.6.4.1.

The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities where found providing a potiential for exposing sensitive information or changing system settings.  Affected products: ABB ASPECT - Enterprise v3.08.02; NEXUS Series v3.08.02; MATRIX Series v3.08.02

The Simple Redirection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and redirect all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almos ... In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic."

Show More

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in SourceCodester Best House Rental Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /rental/ajax.php?action=delete_user of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in 1000 Projects Bookstore Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.8.3, lack of cross-site request forgery protection on the `preview-expression` command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code. The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row, and the attacker must convince the victim to open a malicious webpage. Versi ... OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.8.3, lack of cross-site request forgery protection on the `preview-expression` command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code. The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row, and the attacker must convince the victim to open a malicious webpage. Version 3.8.3 fixes the issue.

Show More

The Pulsating Chat Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amin_chat_button_settings_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Posti Shipping plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.10.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_notices_html() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Ove ... Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Show More

Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Ove ... Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Show More

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eDoc Intelligence LLC eDoc Easy Tables allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects eDoc Easy Tables: from n/a through 1.29.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ritesh Sanap Advanced What should we write next about allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Advanced What should we write next about: from n/a through 1.0.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CMSaccount Photo Video Store allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Photo Video Store: from n/a through 21.07.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Home Junction SpatialMatch IDX allows Stored XSS.This issue affects SpatialMatch IDX: from n/a through 3.0.9.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rajeev Chauhan Load More Posts allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Load More Posts: from n/a through 1.4.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Max Engel Yahoo! WebPlayer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Yahoo! WebPlayer: from n/a through 2.0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alberto Reineri Simple Header and Footer allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple Header and Footer: from n/a through 1.0.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Raphael Heide Donate Me allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Donate Me: from n/a through 1.2.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TannerRitchie Web Applications/DancePress DancePress (TRWA) allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DancePress (TRWA): from n/a through 3.1.11.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Peter MacIntyre RingCentral Communications allows Stored XSS.This issue affects RingCentral Communications: from n/a through 1.6.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ludovic RIAUDEL Custom Post Type to Map Store allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Custom Post Type to Map Store: from n/a through 1.1.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Think201 Mins To Read allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Mins To Read: from n/a through 1.2.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Faster Themes FastBook – Responsive Appointment Booking and Scheduling System allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FastBook – Responsive Appointment Booking and Scheduling System: from n/a through 1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in P. Roy WP Revisions Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Revisions Manager: from n/a through 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Andrea Pernici Third Party Cookie Eraser allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Third Party Cookie Eraser: from n/a through 1.0.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Arrow Design Out Of Stock Badge allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Out Of Stock Badge: from n/a through 1.3.1.