Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ravinder Khurana WP Hide Admin Bar allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Hide Admin Bar: from n/a through 2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in edwardw WP No-Bot Question allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP No-Bot Question: from n/a through 0.1.7.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Benjamin Pick Contact Form 7 Select Box Editor Button allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Contact Form 7 Select Box Editor Button: from n/a through 0.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Naren Members page only for logged in users allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Members page only for logged in users: from n/a through 1.4.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in webgarb TabGarb Pro allows Stored XSS. This issue affects TabGarb Pro: from n/a through 2.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Steveorevo Domain Theme allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Domain Theme: from n/a through 1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in frucomerci List of Posts from each Category plugin for WordPress allows Stored XSS. This issue affects List of Posts from each Category plugin for WordPress: from n/a through 2.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in a2rocklobster FTP Sync allows Stored XSS. This issue affects FTP Sync: from n/a through 1.1.6.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jazzigor price-calc allows Stored XSS. This issue affects price-calc: from n/a through 0.6.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fastmover Plugins Last Updated Column allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Plugins Last Updated Column: from n/a through 0.1.3.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in xjb REST API TO MiniProgram allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects REST API TO MiniProgram: from n/a through 4.7.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rajesh Kumar WP Bulk Post Duplicator allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Bulk Post Duplicator: from n/a through 1.2.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin WP Compare Tables allows Stored XSS. This issue affects WP Compare Tables: from n/a through 1.0.5.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mg12 Mobile Themes allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Mobile Themes: from n/a through 1.1.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CodeBard Fast Custom Social Share by CodeBard.This issue affects Fast Custom Social Share by CodeBard: from n/a through 1.1.2.

The Marketing Optimizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 20200925. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the admin/main-settings-page.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings and inject malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Combodo iTop is an open source and web-based IT service management platform. Prior to versions 2.7.11, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0., iTop has a cross-site scripting vulnerability that can lead to cross-site request forgery on the `_table_id` parameter. Versions 2.7.11, 3.1.2, and 3.2.0 contain a patch for the issue.

The Related Posts for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handle_create_link() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add related posts to other posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This ultimately makes it possible for attackers to view dra ... The Related Posts for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handle_create_link() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add related posts to other posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This ultimately makes it possible for attackers to view draft and password protected posts.

Show More

Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in SMA Cluster Controller, affecting version 01.05.01.R. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to send a malicious link to an authenticated user to perform actions with these user permissions on the affected device.

IBM OpenPages with Watson 8.3 and 9.0 IBM OpenPages could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions, caused by improper validation and management of authentication cookies. By modifying the CSRF token and Session Id cookie parameters using the cookies of another user, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass security restrictions and gain unauthorized access to the vulnerable application.

The Play.ht – Make Your Blog Posts Accessible With Text to Speech Audio plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Comments Extra Fields For Post,Pages and CPT plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several ajax actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. As a result, they may modify comment form fields and update plugin se ... The Comments Extra Fields For Post,Pages and CPT plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several ajax actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. As a result, they may modify comment form fields and update plugin settings.

Show More

The Appsero Helper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'appsero_helper' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in realmag777 WordPress Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter (MDTF).This issue affects WordPress Meta Data and Taxonomies Filter (MDTF): from n/a through 1.3.3.1.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WooCommerce WooCommerce Stripe Payment Gateway.This issue affects WooCommerce Stripe Payment Gateway: from n/a through 7.6.0.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Supsystic Easy Google Maps.This issue affects Easy Google Maps: from n/a through 1.11.11.

Cross-site request forgery is facilitated by OpenCATS failure to require CSRF tokens in POST requests. An attacker can exploit this issue by creating a dummy page that executes Javascript in an authenticated user's session when visited.

A CSRF vulnerability allows malicious websites to retrieve logs and technical support archives in Sophos Connect versions older than 2.2.90.

The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation and the plugin not properly validating a file or its path prior to deleting it in the 'wp_cf7_pdf_dashboard_html_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files, including the wp-config.php file, which can make site takeover and remote code exe ... The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation and the plugin not properly validating a file or its path prior to deleting it in the 'wp_cf7_pdf_dashboard_html_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files, including the wp-config.php file, which can make site takeover and remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show More

The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'wp_cf7_pdf_dashboard_html_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site ad ... The Generate PDF using Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 4.0.6. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the 'wp_cf7_pdf_dashboard_html_page' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show More

The Related Posts, Inline Related Posts, Contextual Related Posts, Related Content By PickPlugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including 2.0.59. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Homey theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.4.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'homey_verify_user_manually' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update verify an user via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The RateMyAgent Official plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rma-settings-wizard'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CridioStudio ListingPro allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects ListingPro: from n/a through 2.9.4.

The Profile Builder WordPress plugin before 3.9.8 lacks authorisation and CSRF in its page creation function which allows unauthenticated users to create the register, log-in and edit-profile pages from the plugin on the blog

The Replyable WordPress plugin before 2.2.10 does not validate the class name submitted by the request when instantiating an object in the prompt_dismiss_notice action and also lacks CSRF check in the related action. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscriber to perform Object Injection attacks. The attack could also be done via a CSRF vector against any authenticated user

The Pocket News Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the option_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The Disable Auto Updates plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'disable-auto-updates' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable all auto updates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

The WP Media Category Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 2.0 to 2.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_mcm_handle_action_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to alter plugin settings, such as the taxonomy used for media, the base slug for media categories, and the default media category via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action ... The WP Media Category Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 2.0 to 2.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_mcm_handle_action_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to alter plugin settings, such as the taxonomy used for media, the base slug for media categories, and the default media category via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Show More

Acora CMS version 10.1.1 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). This flaw enables attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unauthorized actions, such as account deletion or user creation, by embedding malicious requests in external content. The lack of CSRF protections allows exploitation via crafted requests.