CVE-2025-38305

{"id": "CVE-2025-38305", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "[email protected]", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 5.5, "attackVector": "LOCAL", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 3.6, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8}]}, "published": "2025-07-10T08:15:29.320", "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/259119595227fd20f6aa29d85abe086b6fdd9eb1", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d217e7031a5c06d366580fc6ddbf43527b780d4", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87f7ce260a3c838b49e1dc1ceedf1006795157a2", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1b73c452331451020be3bf4b014901015ae6663", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b93e6fef4eda48e17d9c642b9abad98a066fd4a3", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef8fc007c28a30a4c0d90bf755e0f343d99bb392", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory"], "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108"}], "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "[email protected]", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nptp: remove ptp->n_vclocks check logic in ptp_vclock_in_use()\n\nThere is no disagreement that we should check both ptp->is_virtual_clock\nand ptp->n_vclocks to check if the ptp virtual clock is in use.\n\nHowever, when we acquire ptp->n_vclocks_mux to read ptp->n_vclocks in\nptp_vclock_in_use(), we observe a recursive lock in the call trace\nstarting from n_vclocks_store().\n\n============================================\nWARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n6.15.0-rc6 #1 Not tainted\n--------------------------------------------\nsyz.0.1540/13807 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:\n ptp_vclock_in_use drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h:103 [inline]\nffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:\n ptp_clock_unregister+0x21/0x250 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:415\n\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff888030704868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:\n n_vclocks_store+0xf1/0x6d0 drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c:215\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux);\n lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n....\n============================================\n\nThe best way to solve this is to remove the logic that checks\nptp->n_vclocks in ptp_vclock_in_use().\n\nThe reason why this is appropriate is that any path that uses\nptp->n_vclocks must unconditionally check if ptp->n_vclocks is greater\nthan 0 before unregistering vclocks, and all functions are already\nwritten this way. And in the function that uses ptp->n_vclocks, we\nalready get ptp->n_vclocks_mux before unregistering vclocks.\n\nTherefore, we need to remove the redundant check for ptp->n_vclocks in\nptp_vclock_in_use() to prevent recursive locking."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: ptp: eliminar la l\u00f3gica de comprobaci\u00f3n de ptp->n_vclocks en ptp_vclock_in_use(). No hay desacuerdo en que debemos comprobar tanto ptp->is_virtual_clock como ptp->n_vclocks para comprobar si el reloj virtual ptp est\u00e1 en uso. Sin embargo, al adquirir ptp->n_vclocks_mux para leer ptp->n_vclocks en ptp_vclock_in_use(), observamos un bloqueo recursivo en el seguimiento de llamadas a partir de n_vclocks_store(). ============================================== ADVERTENCIA: posible bloqueo recursivo detectado 6.15.0-rc6 #1 No contaminado -------------------------------------------- syz.0.1540/13807 est\u00e1 intentando adquirir el bloqueo: ffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, en: ptp_vclock_in_use drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h:103 [en l\u00ednea] ffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, en: ptp_clock_unregister+0x21/0x250 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:415 pero la tarea ya tiene el bloqueo: ffff888030704868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, en: n_vclocks_store+0xf1/0x6d0 drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c:215 otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: CPU0 ---- lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux); lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux); *** BLOQUEO INTERMEDIO *** .... ============================================== La mejor manera de resolver esto es eliminar la l\u00f3gica que comprueba ptp->n_vclocks en ptp_vclock_in_use(). Esto es apropiado porque cualquier ruta que use ptp->n_vclocks debe comprobar incondicionalmente si ptp->n_vclocks es mayor que 0 antes de anular el registro de vclocks, y todas las funciones ya est\u00e1n escritas de esta manera. En la funci\u00f3n que usa ptp->n_vclocks, ya obtenemos ptp->n_vclocks_mux antes de anular el registro de vclocks. Por lo tanto, necesitamos eliminar la comprobaci\u00f3n redundante de ptp->n_vclocks en ptp_vclock_in_use() para evitar el bloqueo recursivo."}], "lastModified": "2025-12-19T17:58:01.803", "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "7F369340-2B76-438A-A8D2-7A0F994DC4AC", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.186", "versionStartIncluding": "5.14.1"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "459B4E94-FE0E-434D-B782-95E3A5FFC6B1", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.142", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "304E3F01-7D7A-4908-994E-7F95C5C00B06", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.94", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "4FFA54AA-CDFE-4591-BD07-72813D0948F4", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.34", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "0541C761-BD5E-4C1A-8432-83B375D7EB92", "versionEndExcluding": "6.15.3", "versionStartIncluding": "6.13"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:-:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "6A05198E-F8FA-4517-8D0E-8C95066AED38"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "23B9E5C6-FAB5-4A02-9E39-27C8787B0991"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "D185CF67-7E4A-4154-93DB-CE379C67DB56"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "D1DA0AF6-02F4-47C7-A318-8C006ED0C665"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "49DD30B1-8C99-4C38-A66B-CAB3827BEE8A"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "15013998-4AF0-4CDC-AB13-829ECD8A8E66"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.14:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "376A25CF-C05B-48F1-99B1-8FB0314A8E06"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "6D4894DB-CCFE-4602-B1BF-3960B2E19A01"}], "operator": "OR"}]}, {"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "FA6FEEC2-9F11-4643-8827-749718254FED"}], "operator": "OR"}]}], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}