CVE-2024-10306

{"id": "CVE-2024-10306", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "[email protected]", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 5.4, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW"}, "impactScore": 2.5, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8}]}, "published": "2025-04-23T10:15:14.330", "references": [{"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:2973", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:5309", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9434", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9466", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9997", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10306", "source": "[email protected]"}, {"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321302", "source": "[email protected]"}], "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "[email protected]", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-863"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the <Directory> directive should be replaced by the <Location> directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as `Require ip IP_ADDRESS` would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does not serve the general traffic."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una vulnerabilidad en mod_proxy_cluster. El problema radica en que la directiva deber\u00eda reemplazarse por la directiva , ya que esta no restringe el acceso a IP/host como sugiere `Require ip IP_ADDRESS`. Esto significa que cualquier persona con acceso al host podr\u00eda enviar solicitudes MCMP que podr\u00edan resultar en la adici\u00f3n, eliminaci\u00f3n o actualizaci\u00f3n de nodos para el balanceo. Sin embargo, este host no deber\u00eda ser accesible a la red p\u00fablica, ya que no atiende el tr\u00e1fico general."}], "lastModified": "2025-07-01T03:15:20.857", "sourceIdentifier": "[email protected]"}